tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2448843072296729151.post6857135386674025700..comments2023-10-03T07:17:31.763-05:00Comments on White Sox Cards: With Great Joy Comes Great SadnessSteve Giermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10291911419511893670noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2448843072296729151.post-11199228108953088342011-01-06T06:36:50.437-06:002011-01-06T06:36:50.437-06:00One of the Surhoff voters did it on a promise made...One of the Surhoff voters did it on a promise made 30-odd years ago; he still had room on his ballot to vote more. And he's an idiot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2448843072296729151.post-52641101204578605862011-01-05T23:36:26.518-06:002011-01-05T23:36:26.518-06:00If I'm not mistaken, there is a limit of up to...If I'm not mistaken, there is a limit of up to 10 names per ballot. This is assuming that each writer who voted for BJ also voted for the maximum 10 players allowed.<br /><br />It's still amazing to me that in a year where Roberto Alomar can gain 126 votes, Baines can lose 5.<br /><br />Oh well.Steve Giermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10291911419511893670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2448843072296729151.post-51838139977920163452011-01-05T23:05:40.149-06:002011-01-05T23:05:40.149-06:00As much as I would like to blame the 2 voters for ...As much as I would like to blame the 2 voters for BJ, don't writers get to vote for multiple names? Still, your point is valid. Too bad Baines couldn't stay on one more year. Next year looks like a soft class (Bernie Williams) and Baines might have finally gotten in.Johngyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18416011578421652629noreply@blogger.com